On Offshore Trusts

Offshore trusts have gained popularity among high-net-worth individuals and businesses due to their unique advantages in asset protection, financial planning, and wealth management. This article will explore the key benefits of establishing an offshore trust.

Enhanced Asset Protection

Offshore trusts provide a superior level of asset protection compared to domestic trusts. This is primarily due to the following factors:

1. Jurisdictional Advantages: Many offshore jurisdictions have laws specifically designed to protect trust assets from foreign judgments and creditors.

2. Separation of Assets: By placing assets in an offshore trust, you create a legal separation between yourself and those assets, making it more difficult for creditors to reach them.

3. Shortened Statute of Limitations: Some offshore jurisdictions have shorter statutes of limitations for fraudulent transfer claims, reducing the window of vulnerability for trust assets.

4. Burden of Proof: In many offshore jurisdictions, the burden of proof in fraudulent transfer cases lies with the creditor, making it more challenging to successfully challenge the trust.

Global Investment Diversification

Offshore trusts offer expanded investment opportunities that may not be available or as easily accessible through domestic structures:

1. Access to International Markets: Offshore trusts can invest in a wider range of global markets, potentially leading to better returns and risk diversification.

2. Currency Diversification: By holding assets in multiple currencies, offshore trusts can help mitigate risks associated with currency fluctuations and economic instability in any single country.

3. Alternative Investments: Many offshore jurisdictions allow trusts to invest in a broader range of alternative assets, such as precious metals, cryptocurrencies, or foreign real estate.

4. Tailored Investment Strategies: Offshore trusts often have more flexibility in their investment mandates, allowing for highly customized strategies to meet specific financial goals.

Tax Planning Opportunities

While offshore trusts are not primarily tax avoidance tools, they can offer legitimate tax planning benefits:

1. Tax Deferral: In some cases, offshore trusts can defer tax liabilities on certain types of income, allowing for potential compound growth over time.

2. Estate Tax Planning: Properly structured offshore trusts can help minimize estate taxes, particularly for individuals with international assets or beneficiaries.

3. Foreign Tax Credits: Depending on the specific circumstances, beneficiaries may be able to claim foreign tax credits for taxes paid by the trust in its offshore jurisdiction.

4. Treaty Benefits: Some offshore jurisdictions have favorable tax treaties with other countries, potentially reducing withholding taxes on certain types of income.

Advantages of Offshore Trusts Over Domestic Alternatives

Offshore trusts offer several distinct advantages compared to their domestic counterparts, making them an attractive option for comprehensive wealth management and asset protection.

Enhanced Privacy and Confidentiality

Offshore trusts generally provide superior privacy protections:

1. Limited Public Records: Many offshore jurisdictions do not maintain public registries of trusts or their beneficiaries, unlike some domestic jurisdictions.

2. Strict Confidentiality Laws: Offshore financial centers often have robust laws protecting financial privacy, with severe penalties for unauthorized disclosure of trust information.

3. Separation from Home Jurisdiction: By placing assets in an offshore trust, you create an additional layer of privacy from domestic information requests or investigations.

4. Anonymity Structures: Some offshore jurisdictions allow for the use of nominee directors or shareholders, further enhancing privacy for trust-owned entities.

Robust Asset Protection Mechanisms

Offshore trusts typically offer stronger asset protection features than domestic trusts:

1. Non-Recognition of Foreign Judgments: Many offshore jurisdictions do not automatically recognize or enforce foreign court judgments, adding an extra layer of protection against litigation.

2. Stringent Fraudulent Transfer Standards: Offshore jurisdictions often have higher standards for proving fraudulent transfers, making it more difficult for creditors to access trust assets.

3. Protective Legislation: Some offshore centers have enacted specific legislation to enhance the asset protection features of trusts formed in their jurisdiction.

4. Limited Exceptions to Asset Protection: While domestic trusts often have numerous exceptions (e.g., for taxes, alimony, child support), offshore trusts typically have fewer carve-outs.

The Challenge of Piercing an Offshore Trust

Piercing an offshore trust is a complex and challenging endeavor, particularly when it comes to proving that the trust was established with fraudulent intent or to evade legitimate creditors. Offshore trusts are specifically designed to offer robust asset protection, and their effectiveness in safeguarding assets is well-supported by legal structures and jurisdictions that uphold high standards of confidentiality and security.

Legal Framework and Jurisdictional Protections

Offshore trusts are established in jurisdictions with stringent asset protection laws that make it difficult for creditors to pierce the trust. These jurisdictions typically offer:

• Strong Legal Safeguards: Many offshore jurisdictions have enacted laws that specifically protect trusts from being easily challenged by creditors. These laws are designed to prevent attempts to undermine the trust's integrity and ensure that legitimate asset protection is upheld.
• Confidentiality and Privacy: Offshore trusts benefit from high levels of confidentiality, making it challenging for creditors to obtain information about the trust's assets or beneficiaries. This secrecy acts as a significant barrier to legal actions aimed at revealing trust details.
• Trustee and Protector Roles: Professional trustees and protectors are often involved in managing offshore trusts. These roles are designed to ensure that the trust is administered according to its terms and to prevent any misuse of the trust’s assets.

The Legal Hurdles for Creditors

For creditors attempting to pierce an offshore trust, several hurdles make the process difficult:

• Burden of Proof: Creditors must prove that the trust was established with fraudulent intent or to evade specific debts. This often requires clear evidence of wrongdoing, which can be challenging to obtain given the high level of confidentiality associated with offshore trusts.
• Jurisdictional Challenges: Even if creditors manage to gather evidence, they must navigate the legal system of the offshore jurisdiction, which may have strong protections against such claims. Offshore jurisdictions often require a high standard of proof and provide substantial legal defenses against attempts to pierce the trust.
• Fraudulent Transfer Laws: Many offshore jurisdictions have laws that protect trusts from claims of fraudulent transfers, provided that the trust was set up in good faith and not as a means to defraud creditors. These laws are designed to distinguish between legitimate asset protection and fraudulent actions.

Real-World Examples and Considerations

In practice, attempting to pierce an offshore trust often involves significant legal and financial challenges, even for sophisticated creditors or government agencies. Several high-profile cases illustrate how difficult it can be to breach the protective barriers of offshore trusts, even when pursued by powerful entities such as the U.S. government. These examples highlight the robustness of offshore trusts and the complexity involved in challenging them.

1. The "Panama Papers" Scandal

One of the most famous instances involving offshore trusts is the Panama Papers leak, which exposed the use of offshore entities by numerous individuals and organizations globally. Despite the extensive documentation and evidence provided by the Panama Papers, many offshore trusts and companies remained legally intact. U.S. prosecutors and other law enforcement agencies faced substantial hurdles in directly accessing and dismantling these offshore structures. This case underscored the significant legal and procedural obstacles that can complicate efforts to challenge or pierce offshore trusts.

2. The U.S. v. Michael J. Milliken Case

Michael J. Milliken, a high-profile financier, faced significant legal challenges related to offshore trusts. Milliken's offshore structures were targeted by U.S. authorities in their investigations. Despite extensive efforts, including the pursuit of fraudulent transfer claims, the complexity and legal protections surrounding Milliken's offshore trusts posed formidable obstacles. The case highlighted the difficulties even seasoned prosecutors encounter when attempting to breach well-structured offshore asset protection mechanisms.

3. The U.S. v. John McAfee Case

John McAfee, the controversial antivirus software entrepreneur, was also known for his use of offshore trusts to shield his assets. U.S. authorities investigated McAfee's offshore holdings and attempted to pierce the trust structures to claim assets related to various legal disputes. Despite their efforts, the intricacies of offshore trust laws and the robust confidentiality protections proved challenging. The McAfee case illustrated how even high-profile individuals facing legal scrutiny can rely on offshore trusts to protect their assets effectively.

4. The Enron Scandal

The Enron scandal, one of the largest corporate fraud cases in history, involved numerous complex financial arrangements, including offshore entities. Although the primary focus was on accounting fraud and corporate governance, offshore trusts played a role in the concealment of assets. Despite extensive investigations and legal actions, the offshore structures involved presented significant challenges. This case demonstrated the difficulties authorities face in unraveling complex offshore schemes, even in the context of massive financial fraud.

Why U.S. Laws Make It Hard to Pierce Offshore Trusts

U.S. laws and regulations also contribute to the difficulty of piercing offshore trusts:

• The Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA): While FATCA requires U.S. citizens and residents to report foreign financial accounts, it primarily focuses on transparency and tax compliance rather than directly targeting offshore trusts. Compliance with FATCA does not automatically grant U.S. authorities access to the intricate details of offshore trusts, particularly those established in jurisdictions with strong privacy protections.
• The Bank Secrecy Act (BSA): The BSA mandates the reporting of certain foreign financial activities, but its reach is limited. It primarily targets individuals and entities that engage in suspicious financial transactions, rather than providing direct access to the internal workings of offshore trusts.
• Jurisdictional Challenges: U.S. authorities must navigate the legal systems of offshore jurisdictions, which often have strict protections against claims of fraudulent transfers or asset concealment. These jurisdictions may require high standards of proof and offer substantial legal defenses against attempts to pierce a trust.

While offshore trusts are highly effective at protecting assets, they are not entirely immune to legal challenges. However, the complexity and difficulty of piercing an offshore trust mean that they offer superior protection compared to other asset protection strategies. Successful challenges usually involve significant legal and financial resources and are rare.

Key considerations include:

• Thorough Documentation: Properly established offshore trusts with clear and legitimate documentation are less susceptible to challenges. Ensuring that the trust is created and maintained with transparency and adherence to legal requirements strengthens its protection.
• Legal and Professional Advice: Engaging experienced legal and financial advisors in both the home country and the offshore jurisdiction ensures that the trust is structured correctly and that all legal protections are in place.

Flexibility in Trust Structures

Offshore trusts often offer greater flexibility in their structure and administration:

1. Purpose Trusts: Many offshore jurisdictions allow for non-charitable purpose trusts, which can be used for business succession planning or holding specific assets.

2. Perpetual Trusts: Some offshore jurisdictions allow trusts to exist indefinitely, facilitating long-term dynastic planning.

3. Reserved Powers: Offshore trusts may offer more extensive reserved powers for settlors, allowing for greater control over trust assets and administration.

4. Flee Clauses: Many offshore trusts include provisions allowing for the automatic change of trustee or jurisdiction in case of legal threats, providing additional asset protection.

Top Offshore Trust Jurisdictions

When it comes to setting up an offshore trust, choosing the right jurisdiction is crucial. Let's dive deeper into the top locations and compare their unique features.

The Cook Islands

The Cook Islands has long been considered the premier destination for offshore trusts. But what makes it stand out?

Legal Framework

• International Trusts Act of 1984, amended in 1989 and 2004
• Specifically designed to provide maximum asset protection

Asset Protection Features

• Two-year statute of limitations for fraudulent transfer claims
• High burden of proof for creditors (beyond reasonable doubt)
• Non-recognition of foreign judgments

Privacy

• No public registry of trusts
• Strict confidentiality laws protecting trust information

Economic Stability

• Strong ties to New Zealand, providing economic stability
• Tourism and financial services as main economic pillars

Costs

• Higher setup and maintenance costs compared to some jurisdictions
• Reflects the premium nature of Cook Islands trusts

Nevis

Nevis has rapidly gained popularity as an offshore trust jurisdiction. Here's why it's giving the Cook Islands a run for its money:

Legal Framework

• Nevis International Exempt Trust Ordinance of 1994
• Regularly updated to maintain competitive edge

Asset Protection Features

• Two-year statute of limitations for fraudulent transfer claims
• $100,000 bond required from creditors to file claims
• Burden of proof on creditors to prove fraudulent intent

Privacy

• No public registry of trusts
• Confidentiality protected by law

Economic Stability

• Part of St. Kitts and Nevis, a stable Caribbean nation
• Growing financial services sector

Costs

• Generally lower setup and maintenance costs than Cook Islands
• Attractive for those seeking strong protection at a lower price point

Belize

Belize has become increasingly popular for offshore trusts. Let's explore what makes it attractive:

Legal Framework

• Trusts Act of 1992, amended in 2007
• Incorporates strong fraudulent transfer protections

Asset Protection Features

• One-year statute of limitations for fraudulent transfer claims
• Non-recognition of foreign judgments
• Protections against forced heirship rules

Privacy

• No public registry of trusts
• Strong banking secrecy laws

Economic Stability

• Stable democratic government
• Growing economy with focus on tourism and financial services

Costs

• Lower setup and maintenance costs compared to Cook Islands and Nevis
• Attractive for those new to offshore trusts

Cayman Islands

The Cayman Islands is renowned for its sophisticated financial services. Here's what it offers for trusts:

Legal Framework

• Trusts Law (2020 Revision)
• Based on English common law, providing familiarity and predictability

Asset Protection Features

• Firewall legislation protecting against foreign judgments
• STAR trusts for enhanced asset protection

Privacy

• No public registry of trusts
• Strong confidentiality laws

Economic Stability

• One of the world's leading financial centers
• British Overseas Territory, providing political stability

Costs

• Higher setup and maintenance costs
• Reflects the jurisdiction's reputation and quality of services

Singapore

Singapore has emerged as a leading financial hub in Asia, offering attractive trust solutions:

Legal Framework

• Trustees Act (Chapter 337)
• Trust Companies Act 2005
• Based on English common law with local adaptations

Asset Protection Features

• Foreign judgment protection
• No forced heirship rules
• Option for non-charitable purpose trusts

Privacy

• No public registry of trusts
• Strong banking secrecy laws

Economic Stability

• AAA-rated economy
• Politically stable with strong rule of law

Costs

• Moderate to high setup and maintenance costs
• Competitive pricing compared to some European jurisdictions

Jersey (Channel Islands)

Jersey is a well-established offshore financial center with a robust trust industry:

Legal Framework

• Trusts (Jersey) Law 1984
• Frequently updated to maintain competitiveness
• Based on English common law principles

Asset Protection Features

• Firewall provisions against foreign judgments
• No recognition of forced heirship
• Possibility of reserved powers for settlors

Privacy

• No public registry of trusts
• Strict confidentiality laws

Economic Stability

• Strong and stable financial sector
• British Crown Dependency with autonomy in financial matters

Costs

• Higher setup and maintenance costs
• Reflects the jurisdiction's reputation and quality of services

Delaware (United States)

Delaware offers domestic asset protection trusts within the US:

Legal Framework

• Delaware Qualified Dispositions in Trust Act
• Part of the US legal system, providing familiarity for US clients

Asset Protection Features

• Asset protection from future creditors after 4-year lookback period
• Exception creditors include child support and some governmental claims
• Self-settled trusts permitted

Privacy

• No public registry of trusts
• Limited disclosure requirements

Economic Stability

• Part of the US economy
• Long history as a corporate and trust-friendly state

Costs

• Lower setup and maintenance costs compared to offshore jurisdictions
• Potentially higher legal fees for complex structures

Liechtenstein

Liechtenstein offers a unique trust law framework in Europe:

Legal Framework

• Persons and Companies Act (PGR) of 1926
• Combines aspects of common law trusts and civil law foundations

Asset Protection Features

• Strong asset protection laws
• No recognition of foreign judgments in most cases
• Possibility of long-term dynastic structures

Privacy

• No public registry of trusts
• Strong tradition of financial privacy

Economic Stability

• Stable, prosperous economy
• Member of European Economic Area (EEA)

Costs

• Higher setup and maintenance costs
• Reflects the jurisdiction's reputation and specialized services

New Zealand

New Zealand offers a unique proposition as a trust jurisdiction:

Legal Framework

• Trusts Act 2019 (effective from 2021)
• Based on English common law with modern updates

Asset Protection Features

• Foreign judgment protection in certain cases
• No forced heirship rules
• Possibility of indefinite trust duration

Privacy

• No public registry of trusts
• Strict privacy laws, but increasing transparency for tax purposes

Economic Stability

• Stable political and economic environment
• OECD member with good international reputation

Costs

• Moderate setup and maintenance costs
• Generally lower than traditional offshore jurisdictions

Choosing the Right Jurisdiction

When selecting a jurisdiction for your offshore trust, consider these factors:

Asset Protection Strength

1. Cook Islands
2. Nevis
3. Liechtenstein
4. Belize
5. Jersey
6. Cayman Islands
7. Singapore
8. Delaware
9. New Zealand

Cost-Effectiveness

1. Belize
2. Delaware
3. New Zealand
4. Nevis
5. Singapore
6. Cook Islands
7. Jersey
8. Cayman Islands
9. Liechtenstein

Privacy and Confidentiality

1. Cook Islands
2. Liechtenstein
3. Nevis
4. Jersey
5. Belize
6. Singapore
7. Cayman Islands
8. New Zealand
9. Delaware

Reputation and Prestige

1. Singapore
2. Cayman Islands
3. Jersey
4. Liechtenstein
5. Cook Islands
6. New Zealand
7. Delaware
8. Nevis
9. Belize

Ease of Setup and Maintenance

1. Belize
2. Nevis
3. Delaware
4. New Zealand
5. Singapore
6. Cook Islands
7. Jersey
8. Cayman Islands
9. Liechtenstein

The Role of Trustees in Offshore Trusts

Choosing the right trustee is crucial for the success of your offshore trust. Let's explore this vital aspect in more detail.

Types of Trustees

Individual Trustees

• Pros: Personal relationship, potentially lower costs
• Cons: Lack of institutional support, potential for personal issues to affect trust management

Professional Trustees

• Pros: Expertise, institutional support, continuity
• Cons: Higher costs, potentially less personal attention

Trust Companies

• Pros: Comprehensive services, regulatory oversight
• Cons: Can be expensive, may have standardized approaches

Key Responsibilities of Trustees

• Asset Management: Investing and managing trust assets
• Distribution: Ensuring beneficiaries receive distributions as per trust deed
• Compliance: Keeping the trust compliant with relevant laws and regulations
• Record Keeping: Maintaining accurate records of trust activities
• Communication: Liaising with settlors, beneficiaries, and advisors

Choosing the Right Trustee

Consider these factors when selecting a trustee:

• Expertise in offshore trusts
• Understanding of relevant jurisdictions
• Track record and reputation
• Fee structure
• Communication style and accessibility

Advanced Strategies for Offshore Trust Optimization

Once your offshore trust is established, consider these advanced strategies to maximize its benefits:

Layered Structures

Combine your offshore trust with other entities for enhanced protection:

• Trust + LLC: Use an LLC owned by the trust to hold assets
• Trust + Foundation: Combine the benefits of both structures
• Multi-jurisdictional approach: Spread assets across multiple jurisdictions

Dynamic Asset Allocation

• Regularly review and adjust asset allocation within the trust
• Consider global economic trends and geopolitical factors
• Diversify across asset classes and geographical regions

Beneficiary Management Strategies

• Use discretionary distribution clauses for flexibility
• Consider incentive trusts to encourage certain behaviors in beneficiaries
• Implement generational planning for long-term wealth preservation

Tax Optimization Techniques

• Utilize tax treaties between jurisdictions
• Consider the use of underlying companies for business activities
• Explore opportunities for tax-efficient investments within the trust

Compliance and Reporting: Staying on the Right Side of the Law

Proper compliance is crucial for maintaining the legitimacy and effectiveness of your offshore trust.

Global Reporting Standards

• Common Reporting Standard (CRS): Understand its impact on your trust
• FATCA compliance for US-connected trusts
• Country-specific reporting requirements

Due Diligence Procedures

• Know Your Customer (KYC) requirements
• Anti-Money Laundering (AML) compliance
• Source of funds documentation

Regular Audits and Reviews

• Conduct annual reviews of trust activities
• Consider periodic independent audits
• Stay updated on changing regulations and adjust accordingly

The Future of Offshore Trusts: Trends and Predictions

As the global financial landscape evolves, so do offshore trusts. Here's what to watch for:

Increased Transparency and Regulation

• Expect continued pressure for transparency from major economies
• Adaptation of offshore jurisdictions to maintain attractiveness while complying with international standards

Technological Integration

• Blockchain and smart contracts in trust management
• Enhanced cybersecurity measures for protecting trust information
• Digital asset management within trusts

Shifting Geographical Focus

• Emergence of new jurisdictions offering competitive trust structures
• Potential decline of traditional offshore centers due to regulatory pressure

Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Considerations

• Growing importance of ESG factors in trust investments
• Development of "green trusts" focused on sustainable investments

Case Studies: Success Stories in Offshore Trust Planning

Let's look at some of our anonymized cases of successful offshore trust implementations:

The Family Legacy Trust

• Objective: Intergenerational wealth transfer
• Solution: Cook Islands trust with underlying investment companies
• Outcome: Successful protection of family assets and tax-efficient wealth transfer

The Entrepreneur's Asset Protection Trust

• Objective: Protect business assets from potential lawsuits
• Solution: Nevis trust combined with LLC structure
• Outcome: Successful defense against two legal challenges, assets remained secure

The International Investor's Trust

• Objective: Global investment diversification and tax optimization
• Solution: Belize trust with multi-jurisdictional investment strategy
• Outcome: Achieved significant tax savings and portfolio growth

Frequently Asked Questions About Offshore Trusts

Are offshore trusts legal?

Yes, offshore trusts are legal when they are properly structured and comply with the laws of both the offshore jurisdiction and your home country.

Proper setup involves adhering to legal and regulatory requirements in the jurisdiction where the trust is established, and ensuring that all reporting obligations are met. Offshore trusts are widely used for estate planning, asset protection, and wealth management.

Can I maintain control over my assets in an offshore trust?

While you cannot have direct control over the assets in an offshore trust to maintain its legal status and integrity, various structures can be used to ensure your wishes are followed. For example:

• Trustee Control: A professional trustee or a trusted individual manages the assets according to the trust agreement.
• Letter of Wishes: You can provide a letter of wishes to guide the trustee on how you would like the trust assets to be managed and distributed.
• Protectors: Some trusts allow for the appointment of a protector who can oversee the trustee's actions and ensure that the trust is administered according to your wishes.
• Advisory Roles: In some cases, you can retain an advisory role or have input on certain decisions, depending on the trust structure and jurisdiction.

How much does it cost to set up an offshore trust?

The cost of setting up an offshore trust can vary significantly based on factors such as the jurisdiction, the complexity of the trust structure, and the services required. Typical costs include:

• Setup Fees: Initial fees for establishing the trust, including legal and administrative costs, generally range from a few thousand to tens of thousands of dollars.
• Annual Maintenance Fees: Ongoing costs for managing the trust, including trustee fees, legal fees, and accounting services.
• Additional Costs: These may include fees for drafting the trust deed, professional advice, and compliance with local regulations.

Can an offshore trust protect against all types of creditors?

Offshore trusts offer strong protection against many types of creditors, particularly when established in jurisdictions with robust asset protection laws. However, they are not foolproof. Key considerations include:

• Fraudulent Transfers: Transfers made to an offshore trust with the intent to defraud creditors can be challenged in court.
• Jurisdictional Limitations: The effectiveness of protection can vary depending on the jurisdiction's laws and the legal system in your home country.
• Legal Challenges: Creditors may still challenge the trust's validity or seek to pierce the trust if they can prove fraudulent intent or other abuses.

How long does it take to set up an offshore trust?

The time required to establish an offshore trust typically ranges from 2 to 4 weeks, depending on various factors:

• Jurisdiction: Different jurisdictions have varying processing times and requirements.
• Complexity: The complexity of the trust structure and the specific needs of the trust can affect the setup time.
• Documentation: The time needed to prepare and review legal documents, and to comply with regulatory requirements, can also impact the timeline.

Mastering Offshore Trust Strategies with Sans Border

Offshore trusts offer powerful tools for asset protection, tax optimization, and international estate planning. As we've discussed, navigating the complex world of offshore trusts requires expert guidance and a deep understanding of international law and finance.

The Sans Border Advantage in Offshore Trust Services

Sans Border stands at the forefront of offshore trust planning, offering unparalleled expertise and innovative solutions. Our firm excels in:

Global Jurisdictional Expertise

• In-depth knowledge of key offshore jurisdictions and their specific advantages
• Strategic selection of trust locations based on client needs and global regulations
• Ongoing monitoring of international legal and regulatory changes

Customized Offshore Trust Structures

• Design of bespoke trust structures tailored to individual client goals
• Integration of offshore trusts with broader estate and tax planning strategies
• Innovative use of purpose trusts, STAR trusts, and other advanced structures

Comprehensive Compliance and Risk Management

• Ensuring full compliance with international reporting requirements (e.g., FATCA, CRS)
• Implementing robust anti-money laundering (AML) and know-your-customer (KYC) procedures
• Mitigating risks associated with offshore structures through careful planning and documentation

Seamless Global Asset Management

• Coordination with international financial institutions for efficient asset management
• Strategic investment planning within offshore trust structures
• Currency management and global diversification strategies

Your Trusted Partner in Offshore Planning

By choosing Sans Border for your offshore trust needs, you gain a partner dedicated to:

• Maximizing the benefits of offshore structures while minimizing risks
• Ensuring the privacy and security of your global assets
• Adapting your offshore strategy to evolving personal circumstances and global regulations

Contact Sans Border today to explore how our offshore trust expertise can secure and enhance your international financial strategy.